Henrik says a push till +/- 100k (with explosion of alts) and then a drop much lower during recession. On the contrary, your chart shows a 5-wave push up (after new lows). Is this something you don’t agree on, or am I missing something?
You had two counts? Of course the analysis was going to be correct. I remember when you would actually take some risk in your analysis and respectfully I miss that.
Paul, I hope this comes across in the right spirit. I follow your work, I pay for the subscriber area, and I respect the effort you put into the analysis.
That said, I understand why some subscribers are becoming frustrated. Most of us are here mainly for the altcoin cycle, and the optimistic view for late 2025 did not materialise. Of course, no analyst controls the market, and everyone is responsible for their own decisions.
But when recent posts are framed as evidence that the system works, I think that is where the pushback comes from. The main thesis many of us subscribed for is still not proven.
If I recall correctly, during the crash earlier this year, the analysis was also quite far off on how low BTC would actually go. Personally, I am very glad I listened to my own instinct and took profit on BTC rather than relying too heavily on any one forecast.
My main issue is with the scenario structure. You often criticise influencers for always having an “up or down” option available. But when there are always two active counts, it can look similar from the outside. If one count works, the method was right. If the other plays out, that was also covered.
That may be valid risk management, but it also makes accountability difficult. And when the big picture has not played out yet, I think it is too early to claim that the system has demonstrated its value.
Hi Mr. Paul, could you share with us your 3 top alts in % wise? Mean In which you can see most possibility in gains? Thank you
Hi Tomaz
There are now more than 50 assets covered across Elliott Wave 2.0
Each asset includes structure, targets, validation and invalidation levels
The answer will depend on your own risk profile and whether you prefer core assets, ALTs or MEMEs
Take a look through the archive and focus on the opportunities that best fit your own strategy
Paul 👍🏻
Thank you, but would like to have your favourite (s). 50 assets not helpful for me. Thank you
Hi Paul!
Henrik says a push till +/- 100k (with explosion of alts) and then a drop much lower during recession. On the contrary, your chart shows a 5-wave push up (after new lows). Is this something you don’t agree on, or am I missing something?
Many thanks!
Kind regards,
Michaël
Hi Michaël
This has been covered many times in the previous BTC updates and subscriber questions
Take a look through those when you have a moment
Paul 👍🏻
Ok, thanks Paul! Should have subscribed much earlier 😅
Hi Paul,
Thank you. Just wondering if the contingency plan is still valid. Also, when do you think you'll reopen the analysis for alternative coins?
Thanks in advance and great work 🙏.
Hi Pab
The latest updates explain exactly what we need to see next
This is a clear impulsive break
As soon as I see evidence of 🟠 Expansion, I will be shouting it loudly
Paul 👍🏻
Great🤣
Hi
The asset request service will be launching soon
I have been so busy lately
I'm with my daughters over the next few days
I hope to launch this month the fully upgraded service 👍🏻
Thank you, Paul. No problem at all family always comes first. Cheers ✌️
Again, kudos to you Paul. 🕵️♂️
Thank you 👍🏻
Paul
You had two counts? Of course the analysis was going to be correct. I remember when you would actually take some risk in your analysis and respectfully I miss that.
Paul, I hope this comes across in the right spirit. I follow your work, I pay for the subscriber area, and I respect the effort you put into the analysis.
That said, I understand why some subscribers are becoming frustrated. Most of us are here mainly for the altcoin cycle, and the optimistic view for late 2025 did not materialise. Of course, no analyst controls the market, and everyone is responsible for their own decisions.
But when recent posts are framed as evidence that the system works, I think that is where the pushback comes from. The main thesis many of us subscribed for is still not proven.
If I recall correctly, during the crash earlier this year, the analysis was also quite far off on how low BTC would actually go. Personally, I am very glad I listened to my own instinct and took profit on BTC rather than relying too heavily on any one forecast.
My main issue is with the scenario structure. You often criticise influencers for always having an “up or down” option available. But when there are always two active counts, it can look similar from the outside. If one count works, the method was right. If the other plays out, that was also covered.
That may be valid risk management, but it also makes accountability difficult. And when the big picture has not played out yet, I think it is too early to claim that the system has demonstrated its value.
So good chance we see bitcoin to mid 50K?
Hi Seb 👋🏻
This post is designed to evidence the analysis and show what was shared before the move developed
All current technical analysis, probabilities, scenarios and BTC updates are covered in the paid subscriber area
Paul 👍🏻